It comes to OS's attention via an interesting coalition of conservative professional women in South Carolina, Palladian View.
OS gladly shares it with his army of loyal readers.
And, since it will soon disappear down the memory hole once His campaign gets word of it, OS copies it below, just to keep the words alive:
The set-up is: Someone has posted an e-card that say's 'Vote Like Your Lady Parts Depend Upon It'.
And someone leaves a comment with it that declares:
“Any woman that would vote for Republicans that are taking away our
rights is NUTS. What’s next, it will be okay for your husband to beat
you?”
To which came the response from one Amy Clark:
I have counted to 10. I have smiled politely. But I am going to say what needs to be said:
I will vote Republican because I stand on the side of personal
responsibility. I understand that while I have the freedom to make my
own reproductive decisions, any lack of planning on my part does not
constitute a crisis on someone else’s. Nor does it create an excuse to
forfeit human life. I understand that my wants and desires don’t trump
someone else’s freedom of speech or religion. I understand that forcing a
religious institution to violate its conscience for my personal
convenience would make me the worst kind of hypocrite.
I stand on the side of equality. Meaning, I believe that as a woman, I
am perfectly capable of making decisions to provide for myself. Being
on an equal footing with men negates the need for special concessions
from the government to take care of you. I don’t need or want free
“goodies” because I understand that a government that is big enough to
give me everything I want is big enough to take away everything I have.
I stand on the side of intellectual integrity. Meaning, I don’t
traffic in salacious scare tactics by insinuating that anyone would ever
think that domestic abuse was justified. I don’t throw around flamingly
false accusations that a political party is trying to take away birth
control. I understand that tying “women’s rights” to “free birth
control” is an insult to women. It shatters the notion that we have
broken that glass ceiling, when—all these years later—we continue to
allow attention to only be drawn to our reproductive system. Come on.
I stand on the side of moral integrity. Meaning, that though I have
the freedom to behave in whatever manner I want, I choose to live a life
worthy of the gifts I’ve been given. I understand the meaning of “TMI”
and choose to behave accordingly. It’s called having class. I don’t
appreciate my gender being hijacked by women who sacrifice dignity and
self-respect on the altar of an “enlightened” sexuality. Your sex life
does not belong in the political arena any more than the world revolves
around you. Don’t embarrass me in front of my family and my colleagues
in the adult world while you continue to childishly confuse vulgarity
with liberation. One cannot be truly empowered if one doesn’t even have
the power of self-restraint.
So perhaps we can agree to disagree in a lady-like manner. I am fine
with that. You can call me archaic, ignorant, indifferent, and “NUTS” or
worse, that’s fine. I will smile and say, “Have a nice day!” You see, I
am truly, wonderfully, and grace-fully free, choosing to celebrate my
womanhood, my motherhood, my intelligence, my ability and my challenges,
my joys and sorrows, my integrity… and the knowledge that a woman’s
real beauty shines from the inside—reflecting her strength of character.
But please, there’s no crying in baseball, and there should be no
whining in politics. Quit making it difficult for those of us who
understand that rights = responsibility. Please quit muddying the water
of a woman’s voice in government but pretending you speak for all us.
You don’t. I’m a card-carrying member of the NRA, not the NOW. You don’t
speak for me, because I am, in fact, capable of talking about bigger
issues. You know, like the $16 trillion national debt or the current
crisis in the Middle East. Women are really that smart. We are! But when
you claim that women’s top issue in this crucial 2012 election is birth
control, how could you pretend to be seeking true equality?
So I will vote Republican, focusing on the real issues in this
country. I choose to vote like our economy depended on it. I choose to
vote like our Constitutional rights depended on it. And I’ll choose to
vote with my brain, thank you. I just believe better decisions come from
that end.
The culture shapes the economy long before the economy shapes the culture. Where should we devote our energies?
Monday, October 8, 2012
No, Virginia, GW Bush Did Not Create Obama's Deficits: That Was Obama's Doing
One of the more absurd moments for DuhPrez last Wednesday nigh occurred when he pontificated that the deficits of his administration were inherited, 'And we all know what caused that!', going on to cite two wars fought, increased domestic spending and that Evil Tax Cut.
This chart provides a reality check, and proof from the public record that Obama was, once again, making things up as he went along. He probably even believes the stuff he spouts, which is saddening to contemplate.
Next week's New Yorker cover tells the tale in one image. OS plans to buy a copy and frame it.
This chart provides a reality check, and proof from the public record that Obama was, once again, making things up as he went along. He probably even believes the stuff he spouts, which is saddening to contemplate.
Next week's New Yorker cover tells the tale in one image. OS plans to buy a copy and frame it.
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
In Anticipation Of Tonight's Debate, An Essay That Deserves To Go Viral
These are busy busy days for OS, with little time to read, much less write.
However, this essay merits attention, as we limp down the home stretch of a dispiriting political season.
What, one may ask, does the account of this particular obscure 20th-Century monster have to do with the situation we now confront?
In a word, everything.
Our President, and those around him, and those around them, all arrive to us from an academic and intellectual universe that deliberately turns the blind eye to atrocities committed in the name of Progress. Historical Necessity, you know.
It's all so very polite, well-dressed, well-spoken, tweedy-jacket and sensible hairstyles for both genders. White wine, aged cheese, gossip over who will and won't be granted tenure.
It lionizes people like Castro, Chavez, Che, Arafat, Mugabe, Eva Peron, even Ken Philby wasn't that bad a chap. He had his reasons, and he was sincere in his feelings as he created all that havoc. One must understand these things, you know.
That horrible man Mr. Solzhenitsyn, well he just doesn't exist. The cheek of him, saying all those things at Harvard after we had honored him so.
He'll not be invited back, Nobel Prize or no. What was the committee thinking?
Ideas have consequences, and ideologies produce outcomes.
OS asks one thing of his readers. Consider the consequences and outcomes, historically, of the ideas and ideologies promoted by this present administration.
Then, go vote--early--as OS has a premonition of chaos engendered at the polling places of America on Election Day.
However, this essay merits attention, as we limp down the home stretch of a dispiriting political season.
What, one may ask, does the account of this particular obscure 20th-Century monster have to do with the situation we now confront?
In a word, everything.
Our President, and those around him, and those around them, all arrive to us from an academic and intellectual universe that deliberately turns the blind eye to atrocities committed in the name of Progress. Historical Necessity, you know.
It's all so very polite, well-dressed, well-spoken, tweedy-jacket and sensible hairstyles for both genders. White wine, aged cheese, gossip over who will and won't be granted tenure.
It lionizes people like Castro, Chavez, Che, Arafat, Mugabe, Eva Peron, even Ken Philby wasn't that bad a chap. He had his reasons, and he was sincere in his feelings as he created all that havoc. One must understand these things, you know.
That horrible man Mr. Solzhenitsyn, well he just doesn't exist. The cheek of him, saying all those things at Harvard after we had honored him so.
He'll not be invited back, Nobel Prize or no. What was the committee thinking?
Ideas have consequences, and ideologies produce outcomes.
OS asks one thing of his readers. Consider the consequences and outcomes, historically, of the ideas and ideologies promoted by this present administration.
Then, go vote--early--as OS has a premonition of chaos engendered at the polling places of America on Election Day.
Monday, October 1, 2012
As We Prepare For November's Elections, A Thought To Ponder From Tom Paine
Well, not that Tom Paine...an admirer of his, a British subject who spent two decades working in Eastern Europe after The Wall fell, only to return home to a country debilitated by the same ideas that ruined Eastern Europe:
More than half of mankind experienced socialism in the twentieth century. Almost all of us experienced some less full-blooded implementations than were tried behind the Berlin Wall. There has never been a greater experiment in all human history and It led to the deaths of millions and the impoverishment of billions. If ever an idea was ready for the dustbin of history, surely this one was? Yet it marches on. A zombie ideology; dead but still a threat.
As the noise increases in the coming weeks, OS hopes we keep our focus. We don't need a glib hustler who would rather hang out with the ladies on 'The View' while in New York, at the expense of meeting with world leaders who have need of face time. We need a sober grown-up, even if he is stiff as a board in front of an audience.
We need someone who has not drunk the socialist koolaid, insisting we partake with him.
It May Not Matter Who Wins In Syria, Given The Toll The Fight Has Extracted
There are people in this world, as Jesse reminds us from time to time, who are completely willing to burn the world down around them, just so they can claim to rule the ashes.
He, as usual, is correct.
This BBC slideshow give a glimpse of the ancient market in Aleppo, destroyed in this week's episode of Madness Overtakes Syria.
The next time we hear TheWinnerOfTheNobelPeacePrize describe these tragedies as a 'bump in the road', OS thinks it would be good if we asked a simple question:
To Where does this Road lead?
He, as usual, is correct.
This BBC slideshow give a glimpse of the ancient market in Aleppo, destroyed in this week's episode of Madness Overtakes Syria.
The next time we hear TheWinnerOfTheNobelPeacePrize describe these tragedies as a 'bump in the road', OS thinks it would be good if we asked a simple question:
To Where does this Road lead?
Monday, September 24, 2012
The Best ObamaChair Pic To Date: Sense Of Events
All those effigies are, well, in bad taste. Not a good idea. OS believes that it's possible to win every argument and never win one heart.
Humor always works best; low-key, to the point, elegant humor.
So, a big HT and OS shout-out to Don Sensing at Sense of Events. This is funny and pointed, if for no other reason that it draws the contrast between Churchill and our present occupant of the White House.
Now, a brief thought about Eastwood's ruminations at the GOP convention. He walked out to greet the audience without a script, and spotted the chair. It wasn't a set-up, it was improv.
The humorless types in the press were not amused...they called him names, said he rambled, on and on. It never occurred to them what they had just witnessed--an actor, writer, director, producer with over five decades of experience taking the raw material of the occasion, the audience and one lone chair to create something totally memorable. Not bad for someone at age 83!
By the way, along the way--Eastwood ran for mayor of his little town and won, and served the office for several years.
Compare Eastwood with the current occupant of the White House: Which one actually has created wealth with his gifts, created memorable art (and continues to create memorable art), actually administered some office of government before seeking high executive office? Which of them actually has done something with the days allotted by Providence, apart from running for office and spending other people's money? Why is it wonderful to be an actor/director if one is a member of The Left, and disgraceful and suspect when one is a conservative?
That empty chair looks more apropo with each passing day.
Hit that link--you won't be sorry.
Humor always works best; low-key, to the point, elegant humor.
So, a big HT and OS shout-out to Don Sensing at Sense of Events. This is funny and pointed, if for no other reason that it draws the contrast between Churchill and our present occupant of the White House.
Now, a brief thought about Eastwood's ruminations at the GOP convention. He walked out to greet the audience without a script, and spotted the chair. It wasn't a set-up, it was improv.
The humorless types in the press were not amused...they called him names, said he rambled, on and on. It never occurred to them what they had just witnessed--an actor, writer, director, producer with over five decades of experience taking the raw material of the occasion, the audience and one lone chair to create something totally memorable. Not bad for someone at age 83!
By the way, along the way--Eastwood ran for mayor of his little town and won, and served the office for several years.
Compare Eastwood with the current occupant of the White House: Which one actually has created wealth with his gifts, created memorable art (and continues to create memorable art), actually administered some office of government before seeking high executive office? Which of them actually has done something with the days allotted by Providence, apart from running for office and spending other people's money? Why is it wonderful to be an actor/director if one is a member of The Left, and disgraceful and suspect when one is a conservative?
That empty chair looks more apropo with each passing day.
Hit that link--you won't be sorry.
Friday, September 21, 2012
The Obama Administration Moves Our Southern Border To Guatemala: So Says Alan Bersin Of DHS
Really, can't make this stuff up.
While we spend our energies obsessing about what Mitt blurted out while answering a question at what he thought was a private fund-raiser, we might wish to give a bit of our attention to what Alan Bersin says at a public and official function, a reception hosted by the United States-Mexico Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday evening.
Bersin is currently Assistant Secretary of International Affairs and Chief Diplomatic Officer for the Department of Homeland Security. He oversees the Department's international engagement and serves as the principal advisor to Secretary Janet Napolitano on all international affairs.
Says Assistant Secretary Bursin at Homeland Security:
“The Guatemalan border with Chiapas is now our southern border,” Bersin said. He cited a study by Pew Research which showed that last year more Mexicans left the United States than entered it. This, he said, ended six decades of illegal immigration from Mexico.
Bersin said the change in the flow of migration is not a “flash in the pan.” He said economic conditions have played a part in reducing illegal immigration. But so, too, has border security, he argued.
“The economy contributes to it but the enforcement posture in the United States has increased since 1993 in a way that was absolutely unforeseen. One of the great bipartisan accomplishments of the last generation, some would say the greatest accomplishment, Republicans and Democrats alike, was restoring the rule of law to the U.S.-Mexican border,” Bersin said.
Whew--glad we got that cleared up! We've restored the Rule of Law to the US-Mexican border!
Which really doesn't exist anymore...
While we spend our energies obsessing about what Mitt blurted out while answering a question at what he thought was a private fund-raiser, we might wish to give a bit of our attention to what Alan Bersin says at a public and official function, a reception hosted by the United States-Mexico Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday evening.
Bersin is currently Assistant Secretary of International Affairs and Chief Diplomatic Officer for the Department of Homeland Security. He oversees the Department's international engagement and serves as the principal advisor to Secretary Janet Napolitano on all international affairs.
Says Assistant Secretary Bursin at Homeland Security:
“The Guatemalan border with Chiapas is now our southern border,” Bersin said. He cited a study by Pew Research which showed that last year more Mexicans left the United States than entered it. This, he said, ended six decades of illegal immigration from Mexico.
Bersin said the change in the flow of migration is not a “flash in the pan.” He said economic conditions have played a part in reducing illegal immigration. But so, too, has border security, he argued.
“The economy contributes to it but the enforcement posture in the United States has increased since 1993 in a way that was absolutely unforeseen. One of the great bipartisan accomplishments of the last generation, some would say the greatest accomplishment, Republicans and Democrats alike, was restoring the rule of law to the U.S.-Mexican border,” Bersin said.
Whew--glad we got that cleared up! We've restored the Rule of Law to the US-Mexican border!
Which really doesn't exist anymore...
Labels:
Alan Bersin,
Homeland Security,
idiots in charge,
Janet Napolitano,
Mexican border,
Mexican Gangs
Thursday, September 20, 2012
Presidential Press Secretary Jay Carney, Winner Of The Ron Zeigler Award
It's become completely a no-brainer, spike it in the end zone decision by OS's Awards Committee.
For those who don't remember Ron Zeigler, he was Richard Nixon's loyal-to-the-death press secretary. He would proclaim a lie one day, contradict the next day with another lie, and then finally admit that those first statements were lies, while assuring one and all that the country could believe today's pronouncements.
He did this with a completely straight face, day after day, never a moment's apology, as if the cognitive dissonance of replacing one lie with another and another never occurred to him. His only competitor in our time was Baghdad Bob, who claimed the Iraqi Army had crushed the invaders, as the US Marines were pulling up across the street behind him.
Some of Ron's most famous quotes--
"This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative." –April 17, 1973
"If my answers sound confusing, I think they are confusing because the questions are confusing and the situation is confusing."
"The president is aware of what is going on in Southeast Asia. That is not to say that there is anything going on in Southeast Asia." –1971, answering a question if the allied troops were preparing to invade Laos.
Jay Carney must be channeling Ron and Baghdad Bob this week--it's deja vu all over again.
It did not take a genius to see that the attack on the consulate in Benghazi was a planned and orchestrated affair. Ever seen a group of protesters show up will mortars, full-auto weapons, RPG's, and knowledge of the layout of the target?
Turns out, there were never any demonstrators at all...just attackers...
But the 'spontaneous demonstration that just got out of hand because of that terrible terrible awful disgusting YouTube video' story was the Administration's story, and Jay was sticking to it. Even after the Libyan Prime Minister stated flatly that it was a planned attack. And that they had warned the Administration days before. Even after attacks on British diplomats had occurred some days before. The Ambassador himself knew himself to be on an al-Queda hit list. Ni modo. It was all the fault of The Video! Couldn't possibly be al-Queda operation! We've killed 'em all, we've got them on the run!
Bin-Laden's dead and GM lives!
They sent Susan Rice, our UN Ambassador, to five Sunday talking heads shows to talk the White House line. They talked and talked, and ducked and ducked, and spun and spun, and lied and lied and lied. And lied.
Because to admit the truth is to admit that Obama and Hillary left their ambassador hung out to dry, and got him killed.
Here's the sequence.
Finally, today, Jay Carney does admit the obvious. But never an apology, never a moment's embarrassment, never a moment of consideration that this sort of behavior absolutely crushes what little sense of trust anyone may have in him or his boss.
It was a Ziegler Moment. And Jay decided to 'fess up while in the air on Air Force One--with loud background noise, spoken sotto voce.
'This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative.'
'This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative.'
'This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative.'
It would be comic, except--this is how people get killed, wars get started, banks are allowed to blow up the economy, friends of the President are able to commit massive fraud and walk away scot-free, a thousand guns are put in the hands of drug cartels by the ATF and no one notices until the bodies pile up. Even then, no one can seem to locate anyone remotely responsible for the carnage.
For those who don't remember Ron Zeigler, he was Richard Nixon's loyal-to-the-death press secretary. He would proclaim a lie one day, contradict the next day with another lie, and then finally admit that those first statements were lies, while assuring one and all that the country could believe today's pronouncements.
He did this with a completely straight face, day after day, never a moment's apology, as if the cognitive dissonance of replacing one lie with another and another never occurred to him. His only competitor in our time was Baghdad Bob, who claimed the Iraqi Army had crushed the invaders, as the US Marines were pulling up across the street behind him.
Some of Ron's most famous quotes--
"This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative." –April 17, 1973
"If my answers sound confusing, I think they are confusing because the questions are confusing and the situation is confusing."
"The president is aware of what is going on in Southeast Asia. That is not to say that there is anything going on in Southeast Asia." –1971, answering a question if the allied troops were preparing to invade Laos.
Jay Carney must be channeling Ron and Baghdad Bob this week--it's deja vu all over again.
It did not take a genius to see that the attack on the consulate in Benghazi was a planned and orchestrated affair. Ever seen a group of protesters show up will mortars, full-auto weapons, RPG's, and knowledge of the layout of the target?
Turns out, there were never any demonstrators at all...just attackers...
But the 'spontaneous demonstration that just got out of hand because of that terrible terrible awful disgusting YouTube video' story was the Administration's story, and Jay was sticking to it. Even after the Libyan Prime Minister stated flatly that it was a planned attack. And that they had warned the Administration days before. Even after attacks on British diplomats had occurred some days before. The Ambassador himself knew himself to be on an al-Queda hit list. Ni modo. It was all the fault of The Video! Couldn't possibly be al-Queda operation! We've killed 'em all, we've got them on the run!
Bin-Laden's dead and GM lives!
They sent Susan Rice, our UN Ambassador, to five Sunday talking heads shows to talk the White House line. They talked and talked, and ducked and ducked, and spun and spun, and lied and lied and lied. And lied.
Because to admit the truth is to admit that Obama and Hillary left their ambassador hung out to dry, and got him killed.
Here's the sequence.
Finally, today, Jay Carney does admit the obvious. But never an apology, never a moment's embarrassment, never a moment of consideration that this sort of behavior absolutely crushes what little sense of trust anyone may have in him or his boss.
It was a Ziegler Moment. And Jay decided to 'fess up while in the air on Air Force One--with loud background noise, spoken sotto voce.
'This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative.'
'This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative.'
'This is the operative statement. The others are inoperative.'
It would be comic, except--this is how people get killed, wars get started, banks are allowed to blow up the economy, friends of the President are able to commit massive fraud and walk away scot-free, a thousand guns are put in the hands of drug cartels by the ATF and no one notices until the bodies pile up. Even then, no one can seem to locate anyone remotely responsible for the carnage.
Labels:
Benghazi murders,
Jay Carney,
Ron Ziegler,
Terrorism
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
The Politics of Golf, And The Golf Joke Of The Season
Mr. Obama does love his golf! One hundred rounds and counting since he took office.
George Bush loves his golf as well. From September 11, 2001 until he left office, President Bush gave up the game. He felt it would be unseemly to spend days on the course while he had troops in the field.
OS found this joke in the comments at the link above. Please feel free to share along.
It's an old joke, but like all great jokes, its power is rooted in truth.
Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Why I Love Mormonism--Simon Critchley NYT
OS is up to his ears in projects--lots of good things happening, but not much time to write this week.
However, he did run across this essay, and sends it in the direction of his hordes of loyal readers.
Critchley is an English academic resident upon our shores, and he provides a kind and gentle account of his views on the subject of the Mormon religion.
Mormonism is heretical, no doubt about that. At the same time, its errors tend to push its adherents in the direction of striving for virtue and productivity. Think the Mormon Tabernacle Choir as one public face of that approach.
By contrast, the heresy of Liberation Theology, in which the Beloved Leader was steeped, encourages resentment and class warfare. It's Marxism with a Christian patina, very popular amongst all those seminarians of the 1960's who 'heard the call to the ministry' and maintained their military draft exemptions while in seminary--in looong doctoral programs. Rev. Wright's famous (or infamous) pronouncements from his Chicago pulpit are not untypical of the theology he and his espouse.
So, this year, we have Heretic A vs. Heretic B at the top of the ballot.
Oh joy.
Yew payz yer munney, yew takes yer choice.
However, he did run across this essay, and sends it in the direction of his hordes of loyal readers.
Critchley is an English academic resident upon our shores, and he provides a kind and gentle account of his views on the subject of the Mormon religion.
Mormonism is heretical, no doubt about that. At the same time, its errors tend to push its adherents in the direction of striving for virtue and productivity. Think the Mormon Tabernacle Choir as one public face of that approach.
By contrast, the heresy of Liberation Theology, in which the Beloved Leader was steeped, encourages resentment and class warfare. It's Marxism with a Christian patina, very popular amongst all those seminarians of the 1960's who 'heard the call to the ministry' and maintained their military draft exemptions while in seminary--in looong doctoral programs. Rev. Wright's famous (or infamous) pronouncements from his Chicago pulpit are not untypical of the theology he and his espouse.
So, this year, we have Heretic A vs. Heretic B at the top of the ballot.
Oh joy.
Yew payz yer munney, yew takes yer choice.
Labels:
Mormon Tabernacle Choir,
Mormonism,
Simon Critchley
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
In frustration, he turns to his Scottish caddy to inquire what might be going wrong.
Sez the caddy: 'Aye, there's a piece of shyt on the end of yer driver."
The President picks up his driver and cleans the club face, at which point the caddy says:
"No, the other end."