Can't make this stuff up, ya'll.
OS sincerely wishes it weren't true, because it means we are now approaching that day when a Politburo rules, with motorcades of armored limos escorting the PeopleInCharge through the boulevards...
From American Thinker:
Our
U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans who served us there
are dead because of insufficient security while the assistant to the
president for public engagement and intergovernmental affairs, a woman
named Valerie Jarrett, has been given an entourage of well-armed, highly
trained protectors as she goes to and from work in Washington, goes
shopping or out to dinner, and travels to political events and vacations
on Martha's Vineyard.
Why
is Valerie Jarrett such a high priority when it comes to security, and
why are our diplomats in Libya so much less of a priority? In their
eagerness to serve and protect the political interests of Barack Obama,
the news media do not bother to ask and then inform the American people
about this administration's particularly peculiar priorities when it
comes to security at a time when security is something very much in the
news and of great interest to the public.
Conservative
outlets which have made inquiries about why some White House staffer
merits better protection than U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens was accorded
are refused answers on the grounds of "security concerns." Really!
Think
you might have seen a major media story -- perhaps even a great many of
them -- comparing the contrast in security protection between Valerie
Jarrett and Ambassador Stevens if George W. Bush were president and it
were Karl Rove rather than Valerie Jarrett?
No comments:
Post a Comment